A dematel-topsis-wings approach to the classification of multimarket investment funds
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
This paper analyzes the performance of 20 multimarket investment funds in the Brazilian market from May/2015 to April/2017 in order to categorize them into 4 performance levels. The cumulative rate and the funds' volatility are calculated in 2 periods among the total periods studied, in order to generate a mutual degree of influence among the funds of each group. Next, the WINGS method is applied. This method splits each group into 2 subgroups, generating the 4 levels of classification. The use of the methodology classified 5 funds in each subgroup. The data analysis compared the obtained classification with the classification established by the cumulative rate of the funds throughout the entire period and presented 4 ways to prioritize the decision for the funds ranked higher. These 4 ways of prioritizing the decision aim at assisting investors with different points of view.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ANBIMA. (2017) http://www.anbima.com.br/data/files/B4/B2/98/EF/642085106351AF7569A80AC2/Cartilha_da_Nova_Classificacao_de_Fundos_1_.pdf. Access: 20 July 2017.
CALDEIRA, J. F.; MOURA, G. V.; SANTOS, A. A. P.; TESSARI, C. (2014) Seleção de carteiras com modelos fatoriais heterocedásticos: aplicação para fundos multimercados. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 15, n. 2, p. 127-161.
DUARTE JUNIOR, A. M.; MEDEIROS, L. C. B. (2016) Investing in private equity in Brazil. Brazilian Business Review, v. 15, n. 3, p. 51-84.
ELTON, E. J.; GRUBER, M. J. (1995) Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis, 5 ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
GABUS, A.; FONTELA, E. (1972) World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
GOMES, L. F. A. M.; RANGEL, L. A. D.; SANTOS, G. (2016) An AHP-based asset allocation model. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, v. 10, n. 1, p. 78–99.
HAUGEN, R.A. (1997) Modern investment theory, 4 ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
HWANG, C. L.; YOON, K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
INFOMONEY. (2005) http://www.infomoney.com.br/noticias/noticia/412945/hedge-funds-sem-misterios-entenda-que-sao-como-funcionam. Access: 13 June 2017.
LONGARAY, A. A.; ENSSLIN, L.; MACKNESS, J. R. (2014) Multicriteria decision analysis to lead about messes problems: an illustrated case. Independent Journal of Management & Production, v. 5, n. 3, p. 677-692.
MALAQUIAS, R. F.; EID JUNIOR, W. (2014) Fundos multimercados: desempenho, determinantes do desempenho e efeito moderador. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 15, n. 4, p. 135-163.
MARTINS, A. S. S. (2014) Seleção de fundos de investimentos no Brasil: aplicação do método multicritério TOPSIS. Dissertation (Master in Business Administration). Rio de Janeiro: Ibmec Business School.
MELO, R. A.; MACEDO, M. A. S. (2013) Análise multicriterial do desempenho de longo prazo das carteiras de ações de fundos de investimento multimercado macro no Brasil no período de 2005 a 2010. Revista de Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, v. 1, n. 2, p. 69-89.
MELLO, B. B. R. (2014) Classificação de risco setorial com base nos métodos Weighted Influence Non-Linear Gauge System and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Dissertation (Master in Business Administration). Rio de Janeiro: Ibmec Business School.
MESRINEJAD, S.; MORADI, A. (2015) Ranking of investment funds of Tehran Exchange by using TOPSIS method. Journal UMP Social Sciences and Technology Management, v. 3, n. 1, p. 157-164.
MICHNIK, J. (2013) Weighted influence non-linear gauge system (WINGS) – an analysis method for the system of interrelated components. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 228, n. 3, p. 536–544.
ROVAI, R. L. (2015) Estratégias de fundos multimercado no Brasil e a influência da taxa de performance no seu desempenho. Revista de Finanças Aplicadas, v. 3, p. 1-30.
TZENG, G.; HUANG, J. (2011) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
VARGA, G. (2001) Índice de Sharpe e outros indicadores de performance aplicados a fundos de ações brasileiros. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 3, n. 5, p. 215–245.