A Management of the conflict for entrepreneurial innovation at a transnational company located in Mexico
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this work is to analyse how conflict gives way to entrepreneurial innovation – before the non-compatibility between Universalism-particularism at the subsidiary of a transnational company located in Mexico. The evidence was obtained by means of a survey, interviews, analysis of electronic mails, minutes of work, project documents and systemic observation. For this research the SPSS and the root cause analysis were required. Conflict derived from non-compatibility between Universalism and Particularism lead to a more accurate decision making process.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AHLBRECHT, K; BENDIEK, A.; MEYERS R.; WAGNER, S. (2007) Konfliktregelung und Friedenssicherung im internationalen System. Hagen: Fernuniversität in Hagen, Fakultät für Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften.
ALEXANDER, J. (1990) Las teorías sociológicas desde la segunda guerra mundial. Barcelona: Gedisa.
DE LA GARZA, E. (2014) Empresas Trasnacionales, Discusiones Teóricas para su Estudio. Estrategias de relaciones laborales de las grandes corporaciones, v. 8, n. 12, p. 5.
DEAL, T.; KENNEDY, A. (1982) Corporate cultures. The rites and rituals of corporate life, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley
DEUTSCH, M. (1973) The resolution of conflict: constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
DOMÍNGUEZ, R.; GARCÍA, S. (2003) Introducción a la teoría del conflicto en las organizaciones. España: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
DUNNING, J. (1995) Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Austin: Journal of International Business Studies, p. 461-491.
DURKHEIM, E. (1912) Le suicide. Étude de sociologie. Paris.
ESTEINOU, J. (2013) La integración del Mercado Común Europeo-La transformación de los Medios de Comunicación. Signo y Pensamiento, v. 9, n. 17, p. 53-75.
FRITSCH, S. (2015) Technological innovation, globalization, and varieties of capitalism: the case of Siemens AG as example for contingent institutional adaptation. Business and Politics, v. 17, n. 1, p. 125-159.
GASCA, J.; TORRES, F. (2014) El control corporativo de la distribución de alimentos en México. Problemas del desarrollo, v. 45, n. 176, p. 133-155.
GASPAR, R. (2015) Los desafíos al desarrollo urbano-regional en la economía global contemporánea. Revista Urbano, v. 11, p. 17, p. 50-56.
GLASL, F. (2004) Das Kontingenz-Modell der Konfliktbehandlung. Alemania: Perspektive Mediation, v. 1, n. 2, p. 82-87
GONZÁLEZ, T.; STEGGEMANN, M. (2013) Cooperación para la competitividad internacional: caso crítico-atípico. In GUTIÉRREZ, J. S. (coord.) La arquitectura financiera y desarrollo tecnológico para promover la competitividad, Universidad de Guadalajara, México, p. 227-252
GRAS, C. (2013) Expansión agrícola y agricultura empresarial: el caso Argentino. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, n. 32, p. 73-92.
GUNDERT, H.; KLINKE, S.; BLIESNER, A.; NAGLER, B. (2011) Betriebliche Vertrauenskulturen. Hintergrundpapier Landkarte RessourcenKultur. Ressourcen-Kultur Paper, n. 3.
GUSEYNOV, A.; FADHIL, T. (2014) The main trends in the development of the corporate innovation systems. Life Science Journal, v. 11, n. 11s.
HOFSTEDE, G. (1997) Cultures and Organizations, London: McGraw-Hill.
JURADO, J.; CALDERÓN, G. (2006) Los dirigentes y el gobierno de las personas. Argumentos Productivos, organizacionales y culturales. Revista Universidad Eafit, v. 42, n. 144, p. 34-50
KATZ, C. (2014) Discutiendo la mundialización. Razón y Revolución, n. 5.
KRAS, E. (2001) La Administración Mexicana en transición. México: Grupo Editorial Iberoamericana
LANGE, H.; MANSKE, F. (2004) Kultur – ärgerlicher Passepartoutbegriff oder nützliche Kategorie der Gesellschaftsanalyse, in: LANGE, H.; MANSKE, F. (coord.): Kultur im Verän-derungsprozess. Kultur als analytische Kategorie in der Arbeits- und Organisations-, der Innovations- und Umweltforschun, p. 227-248. Baden-Baden: Neue Verlagsgesellschaft
LEE, R. (1964) Religion and Social Conflict: An Introduction. LEE, R.; MARTY, M. (coord.) Religion and Social Conflict. New York, Oxford UP.
LEVY, M. (1966) Modernization and the structure of societies: A setting for international affairs (v. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
MARÍN, A.; STUBRIN, L.; GIBBONS, M. (2014) Construyendo capacidades tecnológicas en escenarios inestables: empresas manufactureras argentinas y brasileñas. Revista de la CEPAL, n. 114, p. 163-182.
MARTIN, M.; GONZÁLEZ, T. (2009) El vínculo empresarial en ausencia del mecanismo de cooperación y su impacto en el desarrollo. El caso de la industria de la confección mexicana, Revista Ciencias Sociales, Chile, Universidad Arturo Prat de Iquique, n. 22
MELUCCI, A.; MASSOLO, A. (1991) La acción colectiva como construcción social. Estudios Sociológicos, p. 357-364.
MUÑOZ, J. (2012) Configuración organizativa de los Centros de Gobierno: Los casos de Alemania y Ecuador. Tercer Encuentro Anual de Sociedad Chilena de Políticas Públicas.
NICHOLSON, M. (1992) Rationality and the analysis of international conflict. v. 19. Cambridge: University Press.
NISTOR, C. (2014) Firms transnationalization. Evolution of multinational groups operating in Romania. SEA-Practical Application of Science, n. 5, p. 51-58.
PARSONS, T. (1951) El Sistema Social. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
PORTA, F. (2013) Trayectorias de cambio estructural y enfoques de política industrial. ponencia presentada en el Seminario Neoestructuralismo y economía heterodoxa, Santiago de Chile: Cepal.
POSADA, E. (2013) Regiones e infraestructura en la integración suramericana. Si Somos Americanos, Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, v. 13, n. 2, p. 113-140.
ROBBINS, S. (2004) Comportamiento organizacional. México: Pearson Educación.
ROMERO, A. (2013) El entorno internacional. Revista Tendencias, v. 1, n. 1.
ROS, M.; SCHWARTZ, S. (1995) Jerarquía de valores en países de la Europa Occidental: Una comparación transcultural. Reis, p. 69-88.
SEIBEL, H.; JAEGER, W. (1970) Leistung und Konflikt. Soziale Welt, v. 21, n. 1, p. 55-72.
SEIBEL, H. (1973) Folgen des Leistungskonflikts in der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Das Ar-gument, v. 15, n. 3, p. 123-143.
SILVA, G. (2008) La teoría del conflicto. Un marco teórico necesario. Prolegómenos: derechos y valores, n. 22.
SCHEIN, E.; MADER, F. (1995) Unternehmenskultur: Ein Handbuch für Führungskräfte. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
STEGGEMANN, M. (2015) Complementariedad entre universalismo y particularismo en la empresa filial de la trasnacional alemana ubicada en México, Thesi (PhD in Administration). Mexico: Universidad La Salle.
TRAUTWEIN, H.; KÖRNER, F. (2014) German Economic Models, Transnationalization and European Imbalances (n. 28/2014). ZenTra-Center for Transnational Studies.
TROMPENAARS, F.; HAMPDEN-TURNER, CH. (1998) Riding the waves of culture. Understanding cultural diversity in Business. México: McGraw-Hill
VERA-VASSALLO, A. (2012) Tecnología, competitividad internacional y desarrollo productivo de América Latina y el Caribe: algunas comparaciones con el Asia en desarrollo. Economía, v. 18, n. 35-36, p. 137-193.