Development of a web application for the optimization of administrative processes: application of the lean methodology for priority classification
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
This study is part of the context of the Research Project signed between the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA) and the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano (IF Goiano) for the development of methodologies with a view to implement and operate an agreement monitoring center. Its objective is to present the tool (software) developed via web to organize the structure of the chain of value of the Ministry of Agriculture's system of agreements, map performance indicators and classify process optimization priorities, based on parameters of efficiency and effectiveness of the reengineering processes. This is applied research in the empirical scenario of the Agreements Sector of MAPA, which uses the case study procedure to achieve its objective. The software development is based on the theoretical framework of Business Process Management (BPM) and Lean Six Sigma, with the application of the GUT Matrix tool and the Eisenhower Matrix for decision making. The primary data were collected through unstructured interviews with nine key informants working in the macro-processes of formalization, execution and monitoring and rendering of accounts of agreements. The results contain the characterization of the MAPA agreement area, highlighting the main activities carried out in the three macroprocesses, the description of the modelling characteristics and functionalities of the developed software and the discussion of benefits arising from the application of information technologies to the Business Process Management (BPM). It can be inferred that the Lean methodology is plausible as a logical “production line”, since it is adaptable to a structured algorithm, which provides an orderly solution of problems focused on continuous improvement.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Antony, J., Rodgers, B., & Cudney, E. A. (2017). Lean Six Sigma for public sector organizations: is it a myth or reality? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(9), 1402-1411, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2016-0127
Aportela-Rodriguez, I. M., & Gallego-Gómez, C. (2015). La información como recurso estratégico en las empresas de base tecnológica. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 25(2), 265-585.
Buller, J. L. (2018). Managing Time and Stress: A Guide for Academic Leaders to Accomplish What Matters. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group Inc.
Brasil, Decreto nº 1.067, de 28 de julho de 1860 (1860). Cria uma nova Secretaria de Estado com a denominação de Secretaria de Estado dos Negócios da Agricultura, Comércio e Obras Públicas. Coleção de Leis do Brasil - 1860, v. 1, p. 15. Câmara dos Deputados, Brasília.
Brasil, Portaria Interministerial nº 424, de 30 de dezembro de 2016 (2016). Estabelece normas para execução do estabelecido no Decreto nº 6.170, de 25 dejulho de 2007, e dá outras providências. Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão, Brasília, DOU, 02/01/2017.
Capote, G. (2012). BPM para dodos: uma visão geral abrangente, objetiva e esclarecedora sobre gerenciamento de processos de negócio. Rio de Janeiro: Gart Capote.
Costa, M. T. P., & Moreira, E. A. (2018). Gestão e mapeamento de processos nas instituições públicas: um estudo de caso em uma Universidade Federal. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina-GUAL, 11(1), 162-183.
Costa, L. B. M., Godinho Filho, M., Fredendall, L. D., & Ganga, G. M. D. (2021). Lean six sigma in the food industry: Construct development and measurement validation. International Journal of Production Economics, 231 (jan), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107843
Flanagan, D. (2011). JavaScript: the definitive guide. 6.ed. Sebastopol-EUA: O’reilly Media.
FM2S (2021). FM2S Educação e Consultoria. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2021. Disponível em:
Fletcher, J. (2018). Opportunities for Lean Six Sigma in public sector municipalities. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(2), 256-267, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS07-2017-0086
Freitas, R. D. C., & Freitas, M. D. C. D. (2020). Information management in lean office deployment contexts. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(6), 1175-1206, doi: https://doi-org.ez369.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2019-0105
Gabler, L. A. (2012). Secretaria de Estado dos Negócios da Agricultura, Comércio e Obras Públicas e a modernização do Império. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional.
Greef, A. C., & Freitas, M. D. C. D. (2012). Fluxo enxuto de informação: um novo conceito. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 17(1), 37-55.
Gomes, A. M., Vieira, P. S., & Reis, A. Cunha (2017). Simulation of operational processes in hospital emergency units as lean healthcare tool. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 8(5), 812-827, doi: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i5.607.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2002). Re-engineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. New York: PerfectBound.
Harmon, P. (2014). The scope and evolution of business process management. In: Brocke, J. Vom; Rosemann, M. (Eds.). Handbook on business process management. v.1. Berlin: Springer, 2014. p. 37–80.
Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (2005). Six Sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Nova York: Currency.
iProcess (2021). Soluções inteligentes de Gestão por Processos. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2021. Disponível em: https://iprocess.com.br/
Juliani, F., & Oliveira, O. J. (2016). State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1033-1041.
Khan, Z. A., Ahmad, M., & Butt, S. (2019). Implementation of lean practices in banks: a qualitative research. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(2), 489-498, doi: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i2.862
Kim, D. K., & Chung, Y. K. (2021). R-BPMN for abstract modeling of business process patterns. Business Process Management Journal, vol. and number ahead-of-print, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2020-0371
Longaray, A. A., Munhoz, P. R., Albino, A. S., & Castelli, T. M. (2015). Use of BPM to redesign the container handling process: a brazilian retroportuary terminal case. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 6(3), 667-686, doi: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v6i3.294
Machado, C. M. L., Scavarda, A., & Vaccaro, G. (2014). Lean healthcare supply chain management: minimizing waste and costs. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 5(4), 1071-1088.
Marques, D. C. R. (2018). Mapeamento de Processos no Setor Público: uma proposta para o processo de aquisições de materiais do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba-Campus de Princesa Isabel. Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal, RN, Brasil.
Medida Provisória n. 2.216-37, de 31 de agosto de 2001 (2001). Altera dispositivos da Lei no 9.649, de 27 de maio de 1998, e dá outras providências. Casa Civil da Presidência da República, Brasília, DOU, 01.09.2001.
Moon, L. (2016). The Eisenhower Matrix Productivity Method. Productivity Trello. Accessed June 19, 2021. Available at: https://blog.trello.com/br/matriz-de-eisenhower
Motta, P. R. M. (2013). O estado da arte da gestão pública. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(1), 82-90.
Nacife, J. M., Teixeira, M. B., & Najberg, E. (2020). The construct of meritocratic organizational behavior as a strategy for managing people. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), e9659109344. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9344
Oracle Corporation (2017). Mysql workbench 6.3 enchanced data migration. Accessed Jun. 17, 2021. Available at: https://www.mysql.com/products/workbench/.
Ottonicar, S. L. C., Santos, B. R. P. D., & Moraes, I. S. D. (2017). Aplicabilidade da competência em informação e da organização do conhecimento no processo de gestão da informação. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 15(3), 629-646.
Pavlicek, J., Rod, M., & Pavlickova, P. (2021). Avaliação de Usabilidade de Padrões de Modelagem de Processos de Negócios - BPMN e BORM Case Study. Anais da Conferência Internacional sobre Engenharia Avançada de Sistemas de Informação. Springer, Cham, 2021. p. 93-104.
Rawashdeh, A. M., Almasarweh, M. S., Alhyasat E. B., & Rawashdeh, O. M. (2021). The relationsip between the quality knowledge management and organizational performance via the mediating role of organizational learning. International Journal for Quality Research, 15(2), pp. 373-386, doi: 10.24874 / IJQR15.02-01
Rodgers, B., Antony, J., Edgeman, R., & Cudney, E. A. (2019). Lean Six Sigma in the public sector: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1(13), doi:10.1080/14783363.2019.1599714
Stary, C. (2021). Digital twin generation: re-conceptualizing agent systems for behaviorcentered cyber-physical system development. Sensors, 21(4) 1096.
Singh, M., Rathi, R., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2021). Analysis and prioritization of Lean Six Sigma enablers with environmental facets using best worst method: a case of Indian MSMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123592.
Venanzi, D., & Laporta, B. P. (2015). Lean six sigma. South American Development Society Journal 1(2), 1-19.
Wahab, A. N. A., Mukhtar, M., & Sulaiman, R. (2013). A conceptual model of lean manufacturing dimensions. Procedia Technology, 11, 1292–1298.
Weske, M. (2019) Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. 3. ed. Berlin: Springer.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Case study: planning and methods. 5. ed., Bookman, Porto Alegre.
Zani, C. M., Borges, M. M., Severo, A. J. B., Garcia, E. R., & Müller, C. J. (2021). Business process management (BPM) application through strategy, indicators and operations model (meio): a health service company case. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(2), 590-612, doi: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i2.1331.