Managing Reputation Risk and Situational Crisis in Higher Institutions of Learning

Main Article Content

Andem Ita Effiong
صندلی اداری

Abstract

Extant literature on crisis and corporate reputation management has presented the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) model as a valid and reliable framework for managing crisis and predicting stakeholders’perceptions of organizations’ reputation in times of crisis. In order to verifythe applicability of the model in higher institutions of learning in adeveloping country context, a study was conducted in September, 2011 in twopublic universities in Nigeria. The findings of the study revealed thatalthough the institutions did not fully implement the core tenets of SCCT, thestrategies adopted in each of the two crisis situations were similar to some ofthe recommendations of the SCCT in different ways. While one institutionfocused on a strategy similar to what the SCCT model describes as “rebuildcrisis response strategy” with informing and adjusting tactics, the secondinstitution utilized a victimization or “Victimage” strategy with strongattribution of blames; and frequent reminder of the stakeholders of the extentof losses that the institution would incur from the crisis. The outcome wasthat the institution with high emphasis on rebuilding and informationadjustment strategy recorded very little damage to its reputation capital, duringand after the crises. Conversely, the second institution which believed invictimization and high attribution recorded significant losses in reputation assets,which included withdrawal of key stakeholders and loss of recognition ofprograms by some professional agencies. The implication for crisis managers in thetwo institutions includes the need to always approach situational crises in aholistic manner. Such holistic approach would involve a refocus, critical analysis,planning and implementation of crisis response strategies based on the relevantsituations, events, and the people concerned. The research was designed as acase study with focus group discussions as the data collection method.Altogether, 16 officers including eight top and senior administrative staff whowere actively involved in the negotiation and communication programs during the crises in the two institutions participated in the focus group discussions.Keywords: situational crisis, reputation risk, stakeholders’perceptions, stakeholders’ value, reputation capital, reputation assets

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Andem Ita Effiong, 1. University of Calabar, Nigeria 2. Wilmington University, New Castle Delaware USA

University of Calabar, NigeriaFaculty of Management Sciences, Dept Of Marketing (Senior Lecturer/Management Consultant)Wilmington University, College of Business Administration, New Castle DE (Doctoral Candidate).

References

BARTON, L. (2001) Crisis in Organization II, 2nd edn. Cinicinnati, OH: College Divisions South-Western.

BESOVA, A. (2008) JetBlue’s valentine day crisis: Implementing state side strategies. Conference Papers Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Retrieved 09/27/2013 from: www.allacademic.com/meta/p271261_index.html.

BLANEY, J. R.; BENOIT, L. M.; BAZEAL, L. M. (2002) Blowout! Firestone's image restoration campaign. Public Relations Review, v. 28, n. 4, p.379-392.

CAMERON G, C. A. (1997) It depends: A contingency theory of accomodation in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, v. 9, n. 1, p. 31-63.

CAMERON, G.; CANCEL, A.; SALLOT, L.; MITROOK, M. (1997) It depends: A contingency theory of accomodation in public relations. Journal of Publications Research, v. 9, n. 1, p. 31-63.

CARROLL, C. E. (2004) How the mass media influence perceptions of corporate reputation: Exploring agenda-setting effects within business news coverage. Austin, Texas: Dissertation, The University of Texas.

CLAEYS, A. S.; CAUBERGHE, V.; VYNCKE, P. (2010) Restoring reputation in times of crisis: An experimental study of the situational crisis communication theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review, n. 36, p. 252-262.

COHEN, J.R. (1999) Advising clients to apologize. Southern California Law Review, p. 1009-1131.

COOLEY, S. C.; COOLEY, A. B. (2011) An examination of the situational crisis communication theory through the General Motors bankruptcy. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, v.3, n. 6, p. 203-2011.

COOMBS, W. T. (1995) Choosing the right words: The development of guidelinesfor the selection of the appropriate crisis response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, n. 8, p. 447-476.

COOMBS, W. T. (2004, July) Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights From situational crisis communication theory. Journal of business Communication, p. 265-289.

COOMBS, W. T. (2006) The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management, n. 12, p. 241-259.

COOMBS, W. T. (2007) Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate reputation review, v. 10, n. 3, p. 163-176.

COOMBS, W. T.; HOLLADAY, S. J. (2002) Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, n. 16, p. 165-186.

COOMBS, W. T.; HOLLADAY, S. J. (2004) Reasoned action in crisis communication. In D. H. Millar (Ed.), An attribution theory-based approach to crisis managment, p. 95-115, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

COOMBS, W. T.; HOLLADAY, S. J. (2005) Exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crisis. In: ASHKANSY, N. Z. (Ed.), Research on Emotion in Organizations, v. 1, p. 271-288. New York: Elsevier.

DEAN, D. H. (2004) Consumer reaction to a negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Businessn Communication, p. 192-211.

DE VAUS, D. (2006) Research design in social research. Thousnd Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

DOWLING, G. (2002). Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image, and Performance. New York: Oxford University Press.

FOMBRUN, C. J.; VAN RIEL, C. B. M. (2004) Fame and Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. New York: Prentice Hall Financial Times.

FUSSELL, S. H.; COLLINS, E.; ZOCH, L. (2009) Through the looking glass: A decade of Red Cross crisis response and situational crisis communication theory. Conference Papers, International communication Association, p. 1-25.

GALLAGHER, A. T. (2013) Empathy during times of crisis and corporate reputation. MA Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Communication and Leadership studies, Spokane, WA: Gonzaga University.

HARLOW, W. F.; BRANTLEY, B. C.; HARLOW, R. M. (2011) BP initial image repair strategies after the Deep-water Horizon spill. Public Relations Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 80-83.

KRIYANTANO, R. (2012, May) Measuring a company reputation in a crisis situation: An ethnography approach on the situational crisis communication theoru. International Journal of Business and Social Science, v. 3, n. 9.

MCDONALD, L.; HARTEL, C. E. J. (2009) Applying the involvement construct to organizational crises'. Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference Proceedings, Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, p. 799-803. Gold Coast, Australia: Griffith University.

MURALIDHARAN, S.; DILLISTONE, K.; SHIN, J. (2011) The Gulf Coast oil spill: Extending the theory of image restoration discourse to the realm of social media and beyond petroleum. Public Relations review, v. 37, n. 2, p. 226-232.

O'LEARY, Z. O. (2010) The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE

PATEL, A.; REINSCH, L. (2003) Companies can apologize: Corporate apologies and legal liability. Business Communication Quarterly, n. 66, p. 17-26.

REBER, B. H.; CAMERON, G. T. (2003) Measuring contingencies: Using scales to measure public relations practitioner limits to accomodations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, v. 80, n. 2, p. 431-446.

ROUSSEAU, D. M. (2006) Is there such a thing as evidence based management. Accademy of Management Review, n. 31, p. 256-269.

SELLNOW, T. L.; ULMER, R. R.; SINDER, M. (1998) The compatibility of corrective action in organizational crisis communication. Communication Quarterly, n. 46, p. 60-74.

SORCE, P. (2002) Relationship marketing strategy. Research Monograph of the Printing Industry Center. Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology.

STURGERS, D. L. (1994) Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival. Management Communication Quarterly, n. 7, p. 297-316.

SUNG, M. L.; YANG, S. (2008) Toward a model of university image: The influence of brand personality, external prestige, and reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research, v. 20, n. 4, p. 357-376.

THIESSEN, A.; INGENHOFF, D. (2011) Safeguarding reputation through strategic, integrated and situational communication management: Development of the integrative model of crisis communication. Corporate Communications an InternationalJournal, v. 16, n. 1, p. 8-26.

TYLER, L. (1997) Liablity means never being to able to say you're sorry: Corporate guilt, legal constraints, and defensiveness in corporate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, v. 11, p. 51-73.

VEIL, S. R.; LIU, M.; ERICKSON, S.; SNELLNOW, T. (2005) Too hot to handle: Competency constraints character in Chi-Chi's Green Onion crisis. Public Relations Quarterly, v. 50, n. 4, p. 19-22.

WALTON L.; COOLEY, S.; NICHOLSON, H. (2012) A great day for oiled pelicans: Twitter and the Deep-water crisis response (White Paper). Retrieved 9/23/2013 from: http://www.prsa.org

WEINER, B. (1985) An attributional theory of achievements motivation and emotion. Psychology Review, n. 92, p. 548-573.

WEINER, B. (1986) An Attributional Theory Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springern Verlag.

WEINER, B. (2006) Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

YIN, R. K. (2009) Case study research: Design and methods, 4 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Inc.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

فروشگاه اینترنتی