A qualitative study on overcoming heterosexist harassment at work: indian cases
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
The Purpose of this paper is to understand the heterosexist harassment faced by Lesbian and Gay employees at the workplace in an Indian context where gender stereotypes are rooted throughout society. It also aims at exploring the coping mechanisms used by these gay/lesbian employees to deal with this harassment. In-depth interviews of six lesbian/gay employees from the NCR region of India were conducted for collecting data and information through open-ended questionnaire. The samples were selected through purposive non-probability sampling technique. Each interview has been explained through a case study by identifying themes and patterns based on cross-case synthesis, pattern matching and explanation building among them. The results revealed that the Lesbian/gay employees frequently experienced bullying, unwanted jokes, discrimination based on sexual orientation, sexual assault, dismissal from the job, social ostracism and isolation. Several coping strategies were identified which help the lesbian/gay employees to deal with these heterosexist harassments at workplace. Four broad categories of coping strategies were identified as support seeking, confrontation, inaction, and quitting. It was also revealed that participants resorted to secrecy and withdrawal as a way of managing labeling and stigma and to further avoid the subsequent heterosexual abuse. The findings of the study will advance the knowledge in the heterosexist harassments and coping mechanism used by lesbian/gay employees at workplace. The results contribute to meaningful social change to build safe work environments for Lesbian and gay employees.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Agarwal, S., Lenka, U., Singh, K., Agrawal, V., & Agrawal, A. M. (2020). A qualitative approach towards crucial factors for sustainable development of women social entrepreneurship: Indian cases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 123135.
Agarwal, S., & Lenka, U. (2016). An exploratory study on the development of women entrepreneurs: Indian cases. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship. 18(2), 232-247.
Anteby, M., & Anderson, C. (2014). The shifting landscape of LGBT organizational research.Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 3-25.
Berrill, K. T., & Herek, G. M. (1990). Primary and secondary victimization in anti-gay hate crimes:official response and public policy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(3), 401-413.
Bertaux, N., & Crable, E. (2007). Learning about women. Economic development, entrepreneurship and the environment in India: A case study. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 467-478.
Birkett, M., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Homophobic name-calling, peer-groups, and masculinity: thesocialization of homophobic behavior in adolescents. Social Development, 24(1), 184-205.
Chrobot-Mason, D., Button, S. B., & Di Clementi, J. D. (2001). Sexual identity management strategies:an exploration of antecedents and consequences. Sex Roles, 45(5/6), 321-336.
Chung, Y. B. (2001). Work discrimination and coping strategies: conceptual frameworks for counselinglesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(1), 33-44.
Correia, N., & Kleiner, B.H. (2001). New developments concerning sexual orientation discrimination and harassment. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21(8/9/10), 92-100.
D’augelli, A. R. (1989). Lesbians’ and gay men’s experiences of discrimination and harassment in auniversity community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(3), 317-321.
Drydakis, N. (2014). Sexual orientation discrimination in the cypriotlabour market. Distastes or uncertainty?. International Journal of Manpower, 35(5), 720-744.
Elmslie, B., & Tebaldi, E. (2007). Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. Journal of Labor Research, 28(3), 436-453.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32(2), 152-175.
Fox, J., & Tang, W.Y. (2017). Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in onlinevideo games: rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New Media and Society, 19(8), 1290-1307.
Freedner, N., Freed, L. H., Yang, Y. W., & Austin, S. B. (2002). Dating violence among gay, lesbian, andbisexual adolescents: results from a community survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 469-474.
Gates, G. T., & Viggiani, A. P. (2014). Understanding lesbian, gay, and bisexual worker stigmatization: a review of the literature. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(5/6), 359-374.
Gaur, S. S., & Anand, I. M. (2020). Role of individuals’ virtues in relationship between emotional responses to government’s actions and their consequences. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(2), pp.327-364.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Simon and Shuster, NewYork, NY.
Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., & Tanis, J. (2011). Injustice at every turn: a report of the national transgender discrimination survey. National Center for Transgender Equality and National LGBTQ Task Force, available at: www.endtransdiscrimination.org/report.html
Grossman, A. H., Haney, A. P., Edwards, P., Alessi, E. J., Ardon,M., & Howell, T. J. (2009). Lesbian, gay,bisexual and transgender youth talk about experiencing and coping with school violence: aqualitative study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 6(1), 24-46.
Haggerty, G. (Ed.) (2013), Encyclopedia of Gay Histories and Cultures, Routledge.
Hemmasi, M., Lee Graf, A., & Russ, G.S., 1994. Gender‐Related Jokes in the Workplace: Sexual Humor or Sexual Harassment? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(12), 1114-1128.
Hewapathirana, G. I. (2011). The role of social identity in internationalization of women‐owned small businesses in Sri Lanka. Journal of Asia business studies, 5(2), 172-193
Hoel, H., Lewis, D., & Einarsdottir, A. (2017). Debate: bullying and harassment of lesbians, gay menand bisexual employees: findings from a representative British national study. Public Money and Management, 37(5), 312-314.
Kanetsuna, T., & Smith, P.K. (2002). Pupil insights into bullying, and coping with bullying: a binationalstudy in Japan and England. Journal of School Violence, 1(3), 5-29.
Kathleen, E. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Konik, J., & Cortina, L.M. (2008), Policing gender at work: intersections of harassment based on sexand sexuality. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 313-337.
Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labelingtheory approach to mental disorders: an empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 400-423.
Liyanage, D. M., & Adikaram, A. (2019). Accepting or rejecting the label: how gay employees cope with harassment at work. Gender in Management: An International Journal.
Lloren, A., & Parini, L., (2017). How LGBT-supportive workplace policies shape the experience of lesbian, gay men, and bisexual employees. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(3), 289-299.
Logie, C. H., Perez-Brumer, A., Woolley, E., Madau, V., Nhlengethwa, W., Newman, P. A., & Baral, S.D.(2018). Exploring experiences of heterosexism and coping strategies among lesbian, gay,bisexual, and transgender persons in Swaziland. Gender and Development, 26(1), 15-32.
Malhotra, N. K., & Das, S. (2008). Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation. PearsonEducation, New Delhi, India.
McDavitt, B., Iverson, E., Kubicek, K., Weiss, G., Wong, C. F., & Kipke, M. D. (2008). Strategies used by gay and bisexual young men to cope with heterosexism. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 20(4), 354-380.
McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: a review of the literature, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 1-17.
Montague, A. M. (2017). Investigating Women Entrepreneurs in Construction and Their Sense of Belonging in a Male Dominated Industry: A MultipleCase Study. Ph.D. Thesis. Northcentral University, Prescott valley, Arizona.
Olson, K. (2010). An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers. Field Methods, 22(4), 295-318.
Ozeren, E. (2014). Sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace: a systematic review of literature, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1203-1215.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications,Thousand Oaks, CA.
Pryor, J. B., & McKinney, K. (1995). Research on sexual harassment: lingering issues and future directions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 605-611.
Riege, A. M. (2003). Validity and reliability tests in case study research: a literature review with “hands‐on” applications for each research phase. Qualitative market research: An international journal, 6(2), 75-86
Rodgers, W. M. (2009). Handbook on the Economics of Discrimination, Edward Elgar Publishing,Cheltenham, GL.
Salin, D., Tenhiälä, A., Roberge, M. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2014). I wish I had. . .’: target reflections onresponses to workplace mistreatment, Human Relations, 67(10), 1189-1211.
Simmons, J. L., & McCall, J. G. (1985). Social Research: the Craft of Finding Out. MacmillanPublishing Company, USA.
Van, E. E. D., Mereish, E. H., Woulfe, J. M., & Katz-Wise, S. L. (2019). Perceived discrimination, copingmechanisms, and effects on health in bisexual and other non-monosexual adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(1), 159-174.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications,Thousand Oaks, CA.