Technology transfer and investments in brazilian public healthcare
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
This study’s objective is to understand the industrial and technological context involved in the offset policy and technology transfer developed in Brazilian public healthcare. Initially, the acquisition of linear accelerators for oncology treatments seemed to be a solution for the problem of long waiting lines in the Brazilian Single Health System (SUS - Sistema Único de Saúde), but the reality was different. Through the methodological procedure of a case study at a hospital renowned for its oncology treatments in the south of the country, it was possible to elucidate its ability to manage the public investment in relation to the industrial and technological context. The relevant findings show that, even with the limitations of the commercial agreement, the hospital at hand was able to, through knowledge, mitigate the difficulties of the offset policy and carry out the technology transfer with ease, due to its familiarity with the new technology. Through this analysis, based on the empirical context, it was possible to summarize the main benefits and setbacks that arise from the strategic and operational levels of the commercial agreement, both at its initial and final stages. This study hopes to spark new investigations on the topic in order to comprehend and intervene in different contexts and situations.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AITKEN, B. J.; HARRISON, A. E. (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American economic review, v. 89, n. 3, p. 605-618.
ANDERSON, E. (2005) Openness and inequality in developing countries: A review of theory and recent evidence. World development, v. 33, n. 7, p. 1045-1063.
BOZEMAN, B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, v. 29, n. 4-5, p. 627-655.
BOZEMAN, B.; RIMES, H.; YOUTIE, J. (2015) The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, v. 44, n. 1, p. 34-49.
BLOHMKE, J. (2014) Technology complexity, technology transfer mechanisms and sustainable development. Energy for Sustainable Development, v. 23, n. 1, p. 237-246.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Plano de expansão da radioterapia. Available: http://portalms.saude.gov.br/ciencia-e-tecnologia-e-complexo-industrial/complexo-industrial/plano-de-expansao-da-radioterapia-no-sus. Access: 16/11/2018.
CNEN (Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear) Quem somos. Available: http://www.cnen.gov.br/quem- somos. Access em: 14/09/2017.
GIBSON, D. V.; SMILOR, R. W. (1991) Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based empirical analysis. Journal of engineering and Technology Management, v. 8, n. 3-4, p. 287-312.
GREEN, D. (1999) Cross cultural technology transfer of sustainable energy systems: a critical analysis. Renewable Energy, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1133-1137.
INCA (Instituto Nacional de Câncer) Estimativa 2016: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2016.
MALM, A. M.; FREDRIKSSON, A.; JOHANSEN, K. (2016) Bridging capability gaps in technology transfers within related offsets. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n.5, p. 640-661.
MASKUS, K. E.; REICHMAN, J. H. (2004) The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, v. 7, n. 2, p. 279-320.
MATTHEWS, R. (1996) Saudi Arabia's defence offset programmes: Progress, policy and performance. Defence and Peace Economics, v. 7, n. 3, p. 233-251.
NANDI, D. M. (2004) Estudo de funcionalidade e segurança para aceleradores lineares utilizados emradioterapia- uma contribuição à gestão de tecnologia médico-hospitalar. Dissertation (Master in Electric Engineering). Florianópolis: UFSC.
OCKWELL, D. G.; HAUM, R.; MALLETT, A.; WATSON, J. (2010) Intellectual property rights and low carbon technology transfer: Conflicting discourses of diffusion and development. Global Environmental Change, v. 20, n. 4, p. 729-738.
PEREZ, M. P.; SÁNCHEZ, A. M. (2003) The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, v. 23, n. 10, p. 823-831.
QUIVY, R.; CAMPENHOUDT, L. V. (2005) Manual de investigação em ciências sociais. 4. ed. Lisboa: Gradiva.
RAMADY, M. A. (2005) Components of technology transfer: a comparative analysis of offset and non-offset companies in Saudi Arabia. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, v. 2, n.1, p. 72- 91.
ROGERS, E. M.; TAKEGAMI, S.; YIN, J. (2001) Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, v. 21, n.4, p. 253- 261.
SPEZZIA, S. (2017) Bolus use in radiotherapy. Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, v. 18, n. 4, p. 183-186.
SOUZA, A. S. (2017) Estudo comparativo dos parâmetros associados à dose absorvida e controle de qualidade em aceleradores lineares com filtro aplainador e sem filtro aplainador. Dissertation ( Master in science) - São Paulo: USP.
SVEDIN, D.; STAGE, J. (2016) Impacts of foreign direct investment on efficiency in Swedish manufacturing. SpringerPlus, v. 5, n. 1, p. 614-622.
THEODORAKOPOULOS, N.; PRECIADO, D. J. S.; BENNETT, D. (2012) Transferring technology from university to rural industry within a developing economy context: The case for nurturing communities of practice. Technovation, v. 32, n. 9-10, p. 550-559.
WAROONKUN, T.; STEWART, R. A. (2008) Modeling the international technology transfer process in construction projects: evidence from Thailand. The Journal of technology transfer, v. 33, n. 6, p. 667-687.
WISNER, A. (1994) A inteligência no trabalho: textos selecionados de Ergonomia. São Paulo, Fundacentro.